Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Pacifica ping pong


Leonard Lopate first came to WBAI in 1977, in the immediate aftermath of Ralph Engelman’s working in close concert with Percy Sutton’s cronies to attempt to redirect, refocus, and repurpose WBAI’s programming away from the original broad-based educational goals and mission to one of narrowing political advocacy, focused on a narrowing definition of ‘community’, accompanied by a move to an increasingly commercial ‘sound’, all in the hope and with the intention and expectation of folding WBAI in to Inner City Broadcasting’s then-thriving local media empire – where there was money to be made.

When existing staff resisted, unionized, and occupied the station for a month, with accompanying negative major press coverage, Engelman called on Sutton’s brother, a judge, to issue an order, and had the police evict all former staff from the station in order to secure complete control of WBAI.

[That same connection, a few years later, incidentally, denied the station’s existing real estate tax exemption, forcing the sale of ‘The Church’ on E62nd Street, the records of which sale, also incidentally, leave a good bit of the monies unaccounted for.]

The station manager, Anna Kosoff, and the program director, Pablo ‘Yoruba’ Guzman, then,  shortly after the police evicted the striking staff members, in the light of the accompanying negative media coverage, promptly fled/resigned in very short order.

Enter, stage left as it were, Leonard Lopate. Lopate, who was in the advertising game, and who had long aspired to a media role, and who was a graduate of Brooklyn College, represented himself as a graduate of Columbia, where his actual association was the fact that his younger brother, Phillip, attended, and who had via that connection gotten himself a program on WKCR, where he did jazz programming.

This credential secured him entree to WBAI, as a jazz expert and a Columbia graduate.

Mr. Lopate
Lopate quickly came to be widely disliked amongst engineering, scheduling, support, and management staff, which is arguably noteworthy as engineering and support staff were more than familiar with dealing with and working with ‘challenging’ personalities. Yet, even given that experience, Lopate stood out. At that time both the Director of Operations and the Chief Announcer, happened to be women. Suffice to say that he did not endear himself, in a fashion that makes it easy enough to visualize his later issues with WNYC.

He was arguably the most notable of the very few examples of on-air people who wouldn’t deign to engineer his own program, that being at that time considered effectively essential for any and all serious on-air talent.

It was something Lopate, however, considered beneath him.

In any event, what may be of some small interest here is not so much Lopate’s assumed superiority, complete with assumed/presumed ‘superior’ academic pedigree, associations, and qualifications, as his attitude toward other staff and talent, which provides a bit of insight as to why he was forced out of WNYC in abject disgrace.

Lopate would routinely assume an air of superiority, authority, and condescension toward other staff, particularly female staff. Within his ego-world he blithely assumed he was superior to, for example, staff who had in fact attended Juilliard and/or Ivy League schools, in part for the simple reason that he so assumed superiority that he was blithely and blissfully unaware of those facts, just as he assumed comparable superiority and condescension to a woman who, in fact, had done her graduate studies at Cornell and at Woods Hole.

Now, in a sense, with Lopate we’re talking about someone who is desperate to find someone – anyone – willing to give him access to air after his being forced out of WNYC in disgrace for his treatment of staff, women in particular.

These are not new behaviors, and the marvel is that it took so very, very long for WNYC to take public action.

So the circle closes, and it’s welcome home to today’s WBAI, where he will likely prove in every sense an exemplary fit.

~ ‘indigopirate’

23 comments:

  1. I never met him personally, but Mr. Lopate was a far more intelligent and skilled broadcaster than most of WBAI's current on-air "personalities".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True enough, but we're speaking of a pretty low bar, aren't we? Don't forget, folks like Irsay were also around at that time. Irsay can fly, skate, and skip, throwing sparks of illumination and delight all the way.
      Lopate, by contrast, can form sentences – which is, granted, superior to the vast majority of current on air 'talent'.

      ~ 'indigo'

      Delete
    2. Talent is no excuse for the kind of behavor Lopate is said to have engaged in. WBAI’s management—apparently with Pacifica’s sanction—bears the blame... and I see tainted halos all over the place.

      It is not difficult to imagine horror on yonder Lew Hill’s face.

      Delete
    3. There is some innuendo in the heading regarding WBAI, Lopate, and Reimers. Can you make clear what has happened. Is Lopate on WBAI? When?

      And as much as I hate the idea of an entitled abuser of people and of women in particular, I have to say that Lopate was brilliant on WNYC. His breadth of knowledge and skill as an interviewer was brought home for me when on a couple of occasions the interviewee either commented that this was the best interview he had experienced, or was amazed at some deep or obscure point of information that Lopate brought up.

      Delete
    4. This is, unfortunately, nnot asbout Lopate’s knowledge, intellect or skill as a bbroadcaster. Were one solely concerned about his professionalism as an interviewwer, anything short of high marks would be open to questions. Not so when the problem is what a casual Google will reveal.

      I suggest that you start with Wikipedia...

      Delete
    5. While at WNYC Mr. Lopate had a staff to read books, write questions, and other show prep tasks for him. Once going "off script" with a question to someone of the likes of Norman Mailer, replied you didn't read the book. Lopate had a professional team working for him. Similar to comparing a pick up softball team (WBAI) playing the NY Yankees.

      Delete
    6. Lopate brings to mind to word "smug" and "glib".
      I used to call him the afternoon Jew;
      Brian Liar was the morning Jew.
      I have a right to this ethnic slur--
      It's my tribe, Athena help me.

      Both MJ and AJ were awful. Couldn't listen to either program for more than five minutes.

      Delete
    7. Oh, the typos, the typos!
      "Lopate brings to mind the words "smug" and "glib".
      Athena forgive me!

      Delete
  2. After all the drama with the transmitter and the audits and so on, there is is still no real change at the station. Business as usual. Gary Null pays the bills. Andrea and her interns mind the store and everyone else continues blabbing their same tired crap.

    ReplyDelete
  3. As has been pointed out, Lopate was supported by a large research team, underpaid and frequently abused, accounting for his apparent omniscience. Having worked with him, I’d judge him to be reasonably bright, but no more. Look at it this way – it was his brother who was admitted to Columbia, not Leonard.

    He is reasonably bright, though, can form sentences, and is generally competent. These facts will place him far, far above the vast majority of WBAI/Pacifica’s on-air talent. In that sense he will represent a breath of intelligent, articulate fresh air.

    WBAI/Pacifica may be perfectly happy to embrace hypocrisy with respect to sexual harassment and misconduct in hope of improved listenership and contributions.

    There will remain, however, the open question as to possible blowback from liberals/progressives/feminists if and when they learn of WBAI/Pacifica’s attempting to return Lopate to a state of grace. Will they behave like a leftist version of Trump supporters, supportive of WBAI/Pacifica irrespective of its supporting scandalous sexual conduct it condemns in others? We may, I suppose, find out.

    It isn’t as if hypocrisy is new to the human condition, so perhaps it will all work out happily, and listeners and financial support will flow like a river.

    ~ ‘indigo, pirate’

    ReplyDelete
  4. Amy decided to give everybody a treat and do yet another black show. haha
    Is bai getting worse , (if that is possible) or is it me ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amy not longer does journalism: she does advocacy.
      Democracy Now is predictable and boring.


      TPM

      Delete
  5. @ Anonymous, July 3rd: Lopate was not accused of sexual harassment, and you sound more like a National Enquirer type reader than anyone who consumes information with any healthy skepticism or serious inquiry. of all the things posted that he had been accused of doing wrong, none of them rises to the level of sexual harassment. anyone who is not a halfwit who had perused all the "evidence" would know this. you (and others') assessment that Lopate's use of a staff that read books and studied up on the topics related to guests means that he was a fraud is just inane. anyone doing any show of that scope could not possibly keep up with every book being published, every play being performed, every restaurant being dined at, etc etc. to me, your qualification that you once worked with him reeks more of bitterness than anything else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mean Gary Null doesn't read all those articles, make movies, see hundreds of patients, etc. during the average week? Now I'm disillusioned...

      SDL

      Delete
    2. In the current social climate and in current usage, the term sexual harassment is entirely appropriate. WNYC chose not to make all accusations public. Of those which were made public, by various reputable sources, including WNYC’s own reporters, both on air and to other reputable media, we have consistent statements that he created a climate where people felt uncomfortable and intimidated, both sexually and in other ways.

      If, in current usage, that doesn’t fit your definition of sexual (and just plain) harassment, you might want to update your understanding of current usage. It’s consonant with most usage, including mine, as a rule.

      Similarly, if my pointing out those very serious negatives while acknowledging his general competence strikes you as ‘bitterness’, I suppose you find a great many recent assessments of media talent rooted in ‘bitterness’. Your issue, not mine, sir madam or small child :)

      Incidentally, I’m assuming you’re referring to me when you address @anonymous in this instance.

      ~ ‘indigothebitterandannoyingpirate’

      Delete
    3. Actually he was fired following accusations of inappropriate conduct.

      https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2017/12/21/leonard-lopate-jonathan-schwartz-fired/

      Delete
    4. ‘Inappropriate Conduct’ is commonly used in formal statements, often as a euphemism, to attempt to minimize risk of legal action. Harvey Weinstein was let go, formally speaking, for ‘inappropriate conduct’, and so was Kevin Spacey, etc, etc.

      There were numerous serious accusations, some of which were of general workplace harassment and many of which were of sexually inappropriate conduct.

      There was a formal investigation, the details of which were held as confidential.

      He was then fired.

      Ask a very simple question: Why hasn’t Lopate sued?

      If you’re fine with that, great. As SDL has pointed out, WBAI/Pacifica has at times given air time to advocates of child abuse, such as Charles Pitts.

      If you’re fine with that, then you’re fine with that.

      Harvey Weinstein produced a long string of wonderful movies.

      ~ ‘indigopirate’

      Delete
  6. Maybe i've missed something, since I haven't turned on WBAI in, at least, a month. Is Lopate back on it?

    To me, Lopate was always a mixed bag of good and bad.

    The good was his abbility to find interesting guests (most of the time) and get good interviews with them for about the first half of a night's show.

    The bad was what normally happened after the guest had left and Lopate opened the phones for general discussion. This is where his Robert Knight type arrogance would show through. Lopate simply couldn't tolerate an intelligent call that disagreed with him, so he would call the person and/or the person's views racist, and cut them off. It didn't matter what the topic of conversation was, but somehow you could talk about chewing gum and get cut off for being racist, if you showed up Lopate.

    Also, I wasn't too enamored with his being buddies with Charles Pitts worshiper David Wynyard, who espoused the same beliefs as Pitts.

    Overall, Lopate's show was a credit to WBAI for the guests that it featured, but he certainly had his failings.

    SDL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Pacifica MavenThursday, July 05, 2018

      I share SDL’s opinions on most issues.
      Here we differ.

      I feel that Lopate is a glib, pompous, unbearable schmuck and shouldn’t get air time anywhere.

      The fact that he has not been smitten by a lightening bolt is proof that the gods don’t exist.

      Delete
    2. @The Pacifica Maven: I was only speaking as a listener, of course. I never met Lopate, but from the sound of him on the air when his guest(s) were gone, I can only imagine his behavior in "real life." He was certainly a self-affirmed intellectual god.

      I still think he had many good guests in his days at WBAI, but minus that, I don't think he would have stood out in any way from many others.

      SDL

      Delete
  7. A one-hour Mon - Fri show, "Lopate at Large" starts at 1PM Monday (July 16). It is a podcast from Robin Hood Radio, so it probably will be aired by other stations. (See WBAI website-click on podcasts).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Comments have been an eye opener. Liars and narcissists are big problem and should not be rewarded even if they have a large vocabulary and can speak in complex sentences and are intelligent. Ethical gate is the first one to pass... You don't make it through... go away and get your act cleaned up.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'll read all this later , gotta get back to equal time for free thought .
    Doing a show on why white people don't get racism .
    Wonder how close bai is to eradicating racism in the world ?. lol

    ReplyDelete